|
|
3 месяцев назад | |
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| configs | 3 месяцев назад | |
| data | 3 месяцев назад | |
| dataset | 3 месяцев назад | |
| evals | 3 месяцев назад | |
| experiments | 3 месяцев назад | |
| jobs | 3 месяцев назад | |
| .gitignore | 3 месяцев назад | |
| CLAUDE.md | 3 месяцев назад | |
| Justfile | 3 месяцев назад | |
| Modelfile | 3 месяцев назад | |
| README.md | 3 месяцев назад | |
| SCORING.md | 3 месяцев назад | |
| convert_gguf.py | 3 месяцев назад | |
| eval.py | 3 месяцев назад | |
| pyproject.toml | 3 месяцев назад | |
| reward.py | 3 месяцев назад | |
| train.py | 3 месяцев назад | |
| uv.lock | 3 месяцев назад | |
license: mit language:
Train small language models to expand search queries for QMD's hybrid retrieval pipeline.
Given a raw search query like "auth config", the trained model produces structured expansions:
hyde: Authentication can be configured by setting the AUTH_SECRET environment variable.
lex: authentication configuration
lex: auth settings setup
vec: how to configure authentication settings
vec: authentication configuration options
These feed into QMD's three search backends:
lex: lines go to BM25 full-text search (short, keyword-focused)vec: lines go to vector similarity search (natural language phrases)hyde: is a hypothetical document passage for embedding-based retrieval (HyDE technique)# 1. SFT: teach the model the output format (~45 min on A10G, ~$1.50)
hf jobs uv run --flavor a10g-large --secrets HF_TOKEN --timeout 2h jobs/sft.py
# 2. GRPO: RL refinement on top of SFT (~20 min on A10G, ~$0.50)
hf jobs uv run --flavor a10g-large --secrets HF_TOKEN --timeout 4h jobs/grpo.py
# 3. Evaluate against test queries (needs local GPU or use eval job)
uv run eval.py --model tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-grpo \
--sft-model tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-sft
# 4. Convert to GGUF for local deployment (Ollama, llama.cpp)
uv run convert_gguf.py --size 1.7B
uv run train.py sft --config configs/sft.yaml
uv run train.py grpo --config configs/grpo.yaml
hf jobs ps # list running jobs
hf jobs inspect <job-id> # check status
hf jobs logs <job-id> # stream logs
hf jobs cancel <job-id> # cancel a job
All tools use the same prompt — Qwen3 chat template with /no_think:
<|im_start|>user
/no_think Expand this search query: {query}<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
The /no_think directive suppresses Qwen3's chain-of-thought mode, producing
direct lex:/vec:/hyde: output without <think> blocks.
finetune/
├── reward.py # Scoring/reward function (single source of truth)
├── train.py # Unified SFT + GRPO training (two subcommands)
├── eval.py # Generate expansions and score them
├── convert_gguf.py # GGUF conversion for Ollama/llama.cpp
├── jobs/
│ ├── sft.py # Self-contained SFT for HuggingFace Jobs
│ ├── grpo.py # Self-contained GRPO for HuggingFace Jobs
│ ├── eval.py # Self-contained eval for HuggingFace Jobs
│ └── eval_common.py # Shared eval utilities
├── configs/
│ ├── sft.yaml # SFT hyperparameters for Qwen3-1.7B
│ └── grpo.yaml # GRPO hyperparameters for Qwen3-1.7B
├── evals/
│ └── queries.txt # 31 test queries across 8 categories
├── data/ # Training JSONL files (all concatenated for training)
├── dataset/
│ ├── prepare_data.py # Format for Qwen3 chat template, dedup, split
│ ├── schema.py # Parse/normalize output format
│ ├── validate_schema.py # Validate JSONL against schema
│ ├── score_data.py # Score all examples using reward.py
│ └── analyze_data.py # Analyze distribution and quality
├── SCORING.md # Detailed scoring rubric reference
└── README.md # This file
Teaches the model the lex:/vec:/hyde: output format from labeled examples.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Base model | Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B |
| Method | LoRA (rank 16, alpha 32) |
| Target modules | All projection layers (q/k/v/o/gate/up/down) |
| Dataset | ~2,290 examples (train split) |
| Effective batch size | 16 (4 x 4 gradient accumulation) |
| Epochs | 5 |
| Learning rate | 2e-4 (cosine schedule) |
uv run train.py sft --config configs/sft.yaml
uv run train.py sft --config configs/sft.yaml --dry-run # preview config
Reinforcement learning on top of the merged SFT weights. The model generates multiple expansions per query, they are scored by the reward function, and the model is updated to prefer higher-scoring outputs.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Base | Merged SFT checkpoint |
| Method | LoRA (rank 4, alpha 8) — smaller for RL stability |
| Target modules | q_proj, v_proj only |
| Reward | reward.py (rule-based, 5 dimensions) |
| KL beta | 0.04 — prevents drift from SFT checkpoint |
| Generations per prompt | 4 |
| Max steps | 200 |
| Learning rate | 5e-7 |
Important: beta > 0 is critical. With beta=0 the model experiences
catastrophic drift and scores drop to 0%.
uv run train.py grpo --config configs/grpo.yaml
uv run train.py grpo --config configs/grpo.yaml --dry-run # test reward function
eval.py generates expansions from a model and scores them against test queries:
# Evaluate an SFT model
uv run eval.py --model tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-sft
# Evaluate a GRPO model (needs SFT adapter merged first)
uv run eval.py --model tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-grpo \
--sft-model tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-sft
# Verbose output with deduction details
uv run eval.py --model tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-sft -v
# Save detailed scores to JSON
uv run eval.py --model tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-sft -o scores.json
reward.py is the single source of truth for scoring. It is used both as the
GRPO reward signal during training and for evaluation.
Five scoring dimensions (max 120 without hyde, 140 with):
| Dimension | Points | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Format | 0-30 | Has lex/vec lines, no invalid lines |
| Diversity | 0-30 | Multiple expansion types, diverse content, no query echoes |
| HyDE | 0-20 | Present, 50-200 chars, single line, not repetitive |
| Quality | 0-20 | Lex shorter than vec, natural language, preserves key terms |
| Entity | -45 to +20 | Named entities preserved in lex and vec lines |
| Think bonus | 0-20 | Reward for NOT using <think> mode |
Hard failures (instant 0.0):
<|im_start|>, <|im_end|>, etc.)Any line without a valid lex:, vec:, or hyde: prefix
# Self-test the reward function
uv run reward.py
Merges base + SFT + GRPO adapters into a single model and produces quantized GGUF files for deployment:
# Use preset for 1.7B
uv run convert_gguf.py --size 1.7B
# Custom models
uv run convert_gguf.py --base Qwen/Qwen3-1.7B \
--sft tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-sft \
--grpo tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-grpo \
--output tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-gguf
huggingface-cli download tobil/qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-gguf \
qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-q4_k_m.gguf --local-dir .
echo 'FROM ./qmd-query-expansion-1.7B-q4_k_m.gguf' > Modelfile
ollama create qmd-expand -f Modelfile
ollama run qmd-expand
All JSONL files in data/ are concatenated for training. To prepare for training:
# Format for Qwen3 chat template, deduplicate, split train/val
uv run dataset/prepare_data.py
# Validate data quality
just validate
The two-stage training approach (SFT -> GRPO) is standard for structured-output models:
SFT establishes format compliance and basic query understanding. It uses a large LoRA (rank 16, all projection layers) because it needs to learn a new output format from scratch.
GRPO refines quality within the learned format. It uses a small LoRA (rank 4, q/v only) and KL regularization to make incremental improvements without losing what SFT taught.
The reward function is entirely rule-based (no LLM judge) which makes it fast,
deterministic, and suitable as an RL signal. See SCORING.md for the full rubric.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Final train loss | 0.472 |
| Final eval loss | 0.304 |
| Token accuracy (train) | 97.4% |
| Token accuracy (eval) | 93.8% |
| Epochs | 5 |
| Hardware | A10G (24 GB VRAM) |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Mean reward | 0.757 |
| Final loss | 0.0005 |
| KL divergence | 0.00048 |
| Mean completion length | ~58 tokens |
| Training time | ~19 min (200 steps) |
| Hardware | A10G (24 GB VRAM) |
| Model | Average Score | Excellent (30) |
|---|---|---|
| SFT | 92.0% | 30/30 |
| GRPO | 91.7% | 30/30 |